The Reception…?

A free karaoke question that should definitely interest you all this week

Question: Okay, we have 2 options for reception site.

Option 1: Reception at the church–no alcohol, no DJ, no karaoke, absolutely no dancing, but its free, a caterer would have to be brought in (we don't know any, so we aren't sure of food quality), decorations needed, and the decor is not bad.
Total: $2200

Option 2: Reception at the resturant Toucan Reef–its pretty far from the church, people would have to pay $2.50 for parking, a DJ will be there, karaoke, dancing, booze (cash bar, we can't afford it), picture perfect view of the water and Charleston's new suspension bridge, and good food, decor fits our colors (still needs more though).
Total: $3000

Hubby likes option because its cheap, and I like option 2.
Which would you choose?

Answer: Go with option 2. You only go around once and people will remember your wedding forever as will you, the bride. By the way, you explain option 2 just a little more enthusiastically than opt. 1. I think you have your mind made up. Maybe there is a happy medium to cut costs a little. Best wishes.
You may also like...

New comments are closed

Comments
15 comments have been left so far »
  1. Ms_E_Bunny
    March 4, 2007

    well obviously music and dancing sounds more fun. $800 in difference is that much… sounds like your fiance wants to elope instead of have a big bash. I personally am not planning on getting married because to me marriage seems to be a business arrangement instead of really being emotional partners..but hell.. that's just me.

  2. John M
    March 4, 2007

    Only $800 difference? Come on - go for the reef! He's not officially "Hubby" yet, but if he won't come up with an extra $800 to give you a memorable evening to start your lives together, you have learned a great deal about him before you have to be stuck with him.

  3. Eryc M
    March 4, 2007

    well dpending on what you are celebrating. go all out and party with option 2. option 1 people will only get bored. and get your money's worth!

  4. Day
    March 5, 2007

    option two as you have to keep the guests happy as well, who wants to go to a reception with no alcohol, dancing or a DJ. If people can not pay $2.50 for parking then they are not worth coming to the wedding reception anyway.

  5. sanchezmelendrez
    March 5, 2007

    If you can afford the extra money go for option 2. This is a once in a lifetime (hopefully) opportunity to spoil yourselfs and celebrate your relationship. It sounds nice, but don't commit to it if you can't afford it just make due with option 1 if you have to and just try to make the best of it. Congrats and Good Luck!

  6. ~~~SPARKY~~~
    March 5, 2007

    Option 2 is much better choice you like to have funa treceptions like dansing the conga line, champagne toast for the bride and grrom , you also want some kind of mucis also and besides people always loosen up when alchole is served, and besides the difference of 800.00 is really nothing look at waht you are getting to compared to what you wont get! the guests will want to enjoy them selfs and thinks of the reception photos at option 2 near the water, how romantic option 2 is more romantic! let us know what you decide and best of luck on your wedding you must be very happy congratulations!!!!

    KEEP ON YAHOOING!!

    ~~~SPARKY~~~

  7. sundragonjess
    March 5, 2007

    Option 2 definately!!!

  8. KATIEKAT
    March 5, 2007

    mmmm, well looking at the two options i would have to pick no2 BUT if its too expensive then what about a room in a pub ? some let you have the room free because they make there money on the drinks. when you get married you can go have your pictures taken at a park or anywhere then with the money you save on a room you could go on honeymoon, what ever you do " have a lovely day "

  9. nora7142@verizon.net
    March 6, 2007

    option 2 and arrange a deal to prepay the parking it is an important day and the extra 1,000 will be worth it to make it right the first plce does not give you a good time and many people expect to be able to get a drink and taost at a wedding. Also the dancing and music are a big part of the day and the memories. Dont you both have a job? an extra $1.000 to $1500 to make it right seems in order to me.

  10. bluez
    March 6, 2007

    If you're only talking $800 difference, go for option 2.

  11. Uncle John
    March 6, 2007

    For the money, I'd go with option#1 or Option #3.

  12. Lissa
    March 6, 2007

    i would choose option two because you and your friends will have more fun. It's only $800, if it was more than that, I would reconsider, but go for it. You only have one wedding day, enjoy yourselves. Best of luck to the two of you.

  13. Angel
    March 7, 2007

    My theory is guys have no say in the wedding plans. If you like option 2, go for it. But if he really wants to be involved with the wedding plans, there has to be some sort of happy medium.

  14. serena
    March 7, 2007

    OPTION 2 SOUNDS LIKE ALOT MORE FUN THEN OPTION 1.WITH ONLY AN 800 DOLLAR DIFFERENCE I WOULD GO FOR THE FUN(OPTION2) INSTEAD OF THE FOOD AND OPTION TO STARE AT EACH OTHER THE WHOLE NITE

  15. Jacob's Mommy
    March 7, 2007

    That depends on your financial situation and your tastes. Personally I think option 2 sounds much better, but I'm not the one paying for it. If you can afford it, and you like to dance I'd go with #2…you'll have a better time I think.

    Congratulations and good luck!!